The Questions Nobody is Asking About AI in Social Care

The EU AI Act compliance deadline for high-risk AI systems used in social care is 2 August 2026. Most providers haven't assessed whether the tools already in their environment fall within scope.

This free guide from OneTouch Health's Group CTO, Seán Morris, cuts through the technology provider noise and gives you the exact questions to ask before you sign anything.

AI is already in your care environment. The question is whether it's governed.

Technology providers are talking about efficiency gains. Regulators are talking about risk. Neither conversation is much use to a Registered Manager or Operations Director trying to make practical decisions about what to adopt, what to defer, and what to avoid.

This guide bridges that gap. It was written by a Group CTO with 18 months of hands-on AI governance experience across the UK, Ireland, and Australia and 14+ years in financial services and cybersecurity, where AI failures have serious consequences. What follows isn't marketing jargon. It's what responsible AI in social care actually requires. 

The Questions Nobody is Asking About AI in Social Care - Landing Page Mockup Image V3

 

Five things every care provider must take from this paper

The deadline is closer than you think

The EU AI Act compliance deadline for high-risk AI systems, including scheduling and risk-prediction tools, is 2 August 2026. Most providers haven't started their assessment. This guide tells you what that assessment involves. 

"Human oversight" has a legal definition

The ICO requires genuine discretion to override automated decisions, not rubber-stamping. If your staff can't realistically challenge a scheduling recommendation or risk flag, you don't have human oversight. You have a compliance fig leaf. 

AI hallucination is a service user safety incident

A 2025 peer-reviewed study found a 1.47% hallucination rate and 3.45% omission rate even in an optimised clinical AI pipeline. Any technology provider that can't describe their specific safeguards shouldn't be trusted with care records. 

Bias is invisible rationing

A 2025 peer-reviewed study found a 1.47% hallucination rate and 3.45% omission rate even in an optimised clinical AI pipeline. Any technology provider that can't describe their specific safeguards shouldn't be trusted with care records. 

The digital foundation is built. Is it governed?

80% of CQC-registered providers now use digital care records, up from 41% in 2021. The question isn't whether you're digital. It's whether your data is governed well enough to support what comes next. 

Bonus: A reproducible checklist

The guide includes a full AI Partner Assessment Checklist, the seven questions to ask any technology vendor before you sign. Vague answers to any of them should give you pause 

Trusted by amazing care organisations, partners, and councils

Bluebird Care Logo
Agincare Logo
Alcedo Care Logo
Verve Homecare Logo
Durham Council Logo
Local Solutions Logo
Mumbys Live-In Care Logo
Active Care Group Logo
First Option Healthcare Logo
HFH Logo

At OneTouch we are proud that:

500 K+

Active recipients of care have been managed by the OneTouch system in the past 12 months

4000 +

Registered care locations use OneTouch throughout the UK, Ireland, and Australia

85 K+

Carers have trusted to help them deliver care in the last 12 months

70 M+

Hours of care have been managed by the OneTouch system in the past 12 months

Seán Morris Headshot - Whitepaper Landing Page
About the Author

Seán Morris, Group Chief Technology Officer - OneTouch Health Group

Seán leads technology, product, and AI strategy at OneTouch Health, a multi-jurisdiction SaaS provider operating across the UK, Ireland, and Australia. His work spans community care, adult and children's care, eLearning, and regulatory compliance platforms.

Before OneTouch, Seán spent 14 years as SVP at Fidelity Investments and has held senior leadership roles in cybersecurity technology, including at TitanHQ. He holds eight US patents in AI and cybersecurity, and is a former Chair of the ITAG Cybersecurity Forum.

This paper is the product of 18 months of hands-on AI governance work in regulated care, not a marketing brochure.